Sonnox® Oxford EQ
User-Rezensionen
Sonnox® Oxford EQ
Only registered users can write reviews. Please, log in or create an account.
F. Lockwood
Indispensable
Indispensable pour les finitions et les détails ! Excellent comme toute la série Sonnox
D. Gonçalves
Oxford EQ
Clear and perfect.
R. Tiburcio
Best tool in my tools box !
Best Eq to remove harsheness
B. WEINGPOL
ดี
สะอาด
B. WEINGPOL
ดี
สะอาด
b. abdou
Excellent equaliseur
Précis et performant
J. Stuart
Superb, worth the money
I got this and immediately put it to use in so many areas. It's simply fantastic, I love it and I'm so glad I bought it. If you buy it with one of the bad package deals, it's a no brainer. My go to EQ. Superb.
A. Geisler
One of the best digital EQ since a decade
For detailed equalisation the Oxford is a studio standard.
It has to be in your plugin folder!
J. Callahan
Great Surgical EQ
I own the native version of this plugin (the code is the same in both). This is a great surgical eq with a very nice character. Don't be fooled by the negative reviews, most are just annoyed at UA for providing the official version after them having bought UA's unofficial Cambridge EQ.
K. Lučinskas
Very musical, always great results
This EQ sounds great even in extreme settings.
D. Kayumov
Puzzled by the low rating
Musical, powerful. Cambridge EQ is used now extremely seldom.
m. linett
great to have it back
Great having this eq back .Thanks UA !
F. Lorenzen
Sehr gut
Der EQ ist am Anfang etwas unübersichtlich und verwirrend aber nach kurzer Arbeitszeit läufts .
Man kann sehr steil damit arbeiten, der Rest ist fast wie immer aufgebaut aber er klingt zudem sehr sehr gut.
e. hartwell
EQ's are critical
There are so many uses for simple EQ's. The Sonnox Oxford EQ is easy to use, its perfect for ear training instruments to frequency ranges, has a familiar look, and its simple. Having used the base digital eq for years, when I finally puled the trigger on the Oxford EQ, it was seamless transition.
I highly recommend!
L. Alin Gabriel
High end eq
High end sounding plugin. Good for everything. A little different than the native one. Null test UAD vs UAD : nulls at -144db, Native vs Native : nulls at -144db, UAD vs Native : nulls at -96db.
A. Crute
Flexible, accurate and musical
The Oxford EQ is about the best I’ve ever used - it always has been, all the way back to when a studio I worked at got it on their ProTools TDM rig when it was first released by Sony. (I never got it for my own TDM / HD rig - it was very pricey, especially with the GML option)
When I changed recently to the UA platform I was pleased to see Oxford EQ was available as a UAD plugin, but it was still pricey. I also noted some people saying UA’s Cambridge EQ was as good, so I gave that a try: Cambridge is a decent EQ, but I can’t agree with anyone who says it compares to the Oxford EQ - it just doesn’t! So I bought Oxford instead (although did wait for a good UA offer to come along!)
The Oxford EQ is astonishingly good - and still about the best I’ve ever used, hardware or software. It can range in action from clinical precision through to big broad-strokes, and at all times sounds sweet and "musical". The UAD version lacks the GML model, which is a shame, but there’s a very similar model in there so I don’t think I’ll miss it too much.
j. king
Amazingly good
This eq is excellent, it's very clean and precise on the audio on the mix, I am so happy and satisfied with it, my next eq is will be the neve 1073.
C. Huseyin
5/5
Being on a HDX system, I love how I can save voices by placing the Sonnox EQ on the UAD Chips. The plugin itself is a very tight sounding EQ, great for gain reduction and boosts have body across the spectrum.
S. PHILIP
Sonnox - the name says it all
Simple yet powerful eq. I like the surgical capability and transparency on this plug....
Bit pricey.... make use of the UAD custom offers....
D. Powell
Neutral but beautiful... do not let the negative rules fool you!
Most of the negative reviews here are about price and other things that don't have anything to do with the actual sound of the EQ. For those who are saying this is not different than other "transparent" EQs, I just have a hard time believing that they are listening in the most critical ways. This is one of the only EQs I know use where I never fear degrading the signal or altering it beyond my intention. I would never consider running a mix through the Cambridge EQ, for instance... not a chance, and wouldn't use it for critical vocals. With the Oxford, I am not afraid to run a whole mix through it, and that is saying a lot. I am never hesitant to use it...... it is very smooth and never adds harshness or mud.